The Heller School For Social Policty And Management The Heller School For Social Policy and Management Brandeis University
Exposure to Neighborhoods with Households with Children by Race/Ethnicity and Income
Year: 2000; Race/Ethnicity: All; Income: All; Ordered: alphabetically; Region: 100 Largest MSAs

Year
Race/Ethnicity




Income



Sort Order
Sort Options


Select Regions


Notes and Sources
Update this Report

Scale Range: 16.0% – 54.1%

1: Akron, OH Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 30.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.4% Barchart image
Affluent 33.0% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 31.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.6% Barchart image
Affluent 31.2% Barchart image
Black Poor 32.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.4% Barchart image
Affluent 32.4% Barchart image
Asian Poor 23.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.4% Barchart image
Affluent 35.1% Barchart image
2: Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 29.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.3% Barchart image
Affluent 32.5% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 28.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 29.1% Barchart image
Affluent 32.0% Barchart image
Black Poor 29.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 29.1% Barchart image
Affluent 29.7% Barchart image
Asian Poor 23.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 28.1% Barchart image
Affluent 31.7% Barchart image
3: Albuquerque, NM Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 30.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.8% Barchart image
Affluent 32.9% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 34.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.8% Barchart image
Affluent 36.6% Barchart image
Black Poor 33.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.3% Barchart image
Affluent 35.4% Barchart image
Asian Poor 30.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.1% Barchart image
Affluent 34.0% Barchart image
4: Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 30.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.1% Barchart image
Affluent 32.9% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 34.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.6% Barchart image
Affluent 33.4% Barchart image
Black Poor 32.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.5% Barchart image
Affluent 32.9% Barchart image
Asian Poor 28.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.8% Barchart image
Affluent 32.7% Barchart image
5: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 34.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.1% Barchart image
Affluent 38.1% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 33.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.8% Barchart image
Affluent 35.9% Barchart image
Black Poor 34.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.3% Barchart image
Affluent 38.3% Barchart image
Asian Poor 31.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.9% Barchart image
Affluent 37.5% Barchart image
6: Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 34.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.4% Barchart image
Affluent 37.5% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 37.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 39.2% Barchart image
Affluent 41.3% Barchart image
Black Poor 34.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 38.2% Barchart image
Affluent 38.8% Barchart image
Asian Poor 37.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 40.3% Barchart image
Affluent 41.9% Barchart image
7: Austin-Round Rock, TX Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 27.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.6% Barchart image
Affluent 36.8% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 31.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.7% Barchart image
Affluent 37.9% Barchart image
Black Poor 33.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.0% Barchart image
Affluent 39.2% Barchart image
Asian Poor 19.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 28.5% Barchart image
Affluent 36.7% Barchart image
8: Bakersfield, CA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 38.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 40.2% Barchart image
Affluent 40.2% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 50.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 50.0% Barchart image
Affluent 47.9% Barchart image
Black Poor 45.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 44.7% Barchart image
Affluent 44.6% Barchart image
Asian Poor 48.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 47.8% Barchart image
Affluent 46.7% Barchart image
9: Baltimore-Towson, MD Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 30.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.6% Barchart image
Affluent 35.1% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 30.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.6% Barchart image
Affluent 34.7% Barchart image
Black Poor 30.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.6% Barchart image
Affluent 32.9% Barchart image
Asian Poor 27.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.7% Barchart image
Affluent 37.0% Barchart image
10: Baton Rouge, LA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 34.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.9% Barchart image
Affluent 36.9% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 31.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.7% Barchart image
Affluent 37.0% Barchart image
Black Poor 35.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.9% Barchart image
Affluent 37.3% Barchart image
Asian Poor 27.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.2% Barchart image
Affluent 34.5% Barchart image
11: Birmingham-Hoover, AL Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 31.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.8% Barchart image
Affluent 34.4% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 31.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.2% Barchart image
Affluent 32.9% Barchart image
Black Poor 31.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.9% Barchart image
Affluent 32.8% Barchart image
Asian Poor 24.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.0% Barchart image
Affluent 31.6% Barchart image
12: Boise City-Nampa, ID Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 35.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 38.0% Barchart image
Affluent 39.7% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 37.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 38.9% Barchart image
Affluent 40.5% Barchart image
Black Poor
Middle-Income
Affluent
Asian Poor 35.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 37.1% Barchart image
Affluent 38.4% Barchart image
13: Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 29.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.5% Barchart image
Affluent 32.5% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 34.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.3% Barchart image
Affluent 32.6% Barchart image
Black Poor 33.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.0% Barchart image
Affluent 33.5% Barchart image
Asian Poor 22.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 26.2% Barchart image
Affluent 29.4% Barchart image
14: Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 32.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.1% Barchart image
Affluent 36.8% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 37.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.0% Barchart image
Affluent 34.5% Barchart image
Black Poor 36.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.3% Barchart image
Affluent 34.2% Barchart image
Asian Poor 30.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.4% Barchart image
Affluent 33.0% Barchart image
15: Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Tonawanda, NY Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 29.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.1% Barchart image
Affluent 31.4% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 31.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.8% Barchart image
Affluent 31.3% Barchart image
Black Poor 31.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.6% Barchart image
Affluent 31.2% Barchart image
Asian Poor 27.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 28.0% Barchart image
Affluent 33.3% Barchart image
16: Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 20.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 22.4% Barchart image
Affluent 21.6% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 28.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 28.6% Barchart image
Affluent 28.8% Barchart image
Black Poor 35.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.1% Barchart image
Affluent 33.7% Barchart image
Asian Poor
Middle-Income
Affluent
17: Charleston-North Charleston, SC Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 32.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.6% Barchart image
Affluent 34.1% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 36.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.8% Barchart image
Affluent 35.7% Barchart image
Black Poor 32.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.9% Barchart image
Affluent 33.7% Barchart image
Asian Poor 31.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.7% Barchart image
Affluent 36.7% Barchart image
18: Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 32.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.6% Barchart image
Affluent 35.2% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 31.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.6% Barchart image
Affluent 34.9% Barchart image
Black Poor 32.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.2% Barchart image
Affluent 34.8% Barchart image
Asian Poor 31.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.1% Barchart image
Affluent 34.7% Barchart image
19: Chattanooga, TN-GA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 30.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.5% Barchart image
Affluent 32.5% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 29.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.9% Barchart image
Affluent 29.3% Barchart image
Black Poor 29.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 29.1% Barchart image
Affluent 30.2% Barchart image
Asian Poor
Middle-Income
Affluent
20: Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 32.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.3% Barchart image
Affluent 35.4% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 40.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 40.9% Barchart image
Affluent 39.7% Barchart image
Black Poor 34.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.4% Barchart image
Affluent 33.8% Barchart image
Asian Poor 28.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.9% Barchart image
Affluent 34.7% Barchart image
21: Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 32.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.5% Barchart image
Affluent 36.9% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 30.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.3% Barchart image
Affluent 34.7% Barchart image
Black Poor 31.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.8% Barchart image
Affluent 31.9% Barchart image
Asian Poor 24.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.0% Barchart image
Affluent 36.3% Barchart image
22: Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 29.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.3% Barchart image
Affluent 32.2% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 34.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.8% Barchart image
Affluent 33.2% Barchart image
Black Poor 31.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.8% Barchart image
Affluent 30.9% Barchart image
Asian Poor 23.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 27.1% Barchart image
Affluent 30.9% Barchart image
23: Colorado Springs, CO Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 33.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 37.3% Barchart image
Affluent 39.3% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 34.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 38.3% Barchart image
Affluent 40.1% Barchart image
Black Poor 37.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 42.6% Barchart image
Affluent 43.2% Barchart image
Asian Poor 36.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 38.7% Barchart image
Affluent 41.5% Barchart image
24: Columbia, SC Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 31.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.1% Barchart image
Affluent 35.8% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 32.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.2% Barchart image
Affluent 36.0% Barchart image
Black Poor 31.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.1% Barchart image
Affluent 35.9% Barchart image
Asian Poor 26.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.4% Barchart image
Affluent 36.9% Barchart image
25: Columbus, OH Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 30.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.6% Barchart image
Affluent 35.7% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 28.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.9% Barchart image
Affluent 34.8% Barchart image
Black Poor 32.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.3% Barchart image
Affluent 33.3% Barchart image
Asian Poor 20.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 29.8% Barchart image
Affluent 34.3% Barchart image
26: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 34.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.2% Barchart image
Affluent 39.4% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 40.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 40.3% Barchart image
Affluent 40.9% Barchart image
Black Poor 35.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.2% Barchart image
Affluent 40.0% Barchart image
Asian Poor 33.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.7% Barchart image
Affluent 39.3% Barchart image
27: Dayton, OH Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 30.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.5% Barchart image
Affluent 32.4% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 29.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.2% Barchart image
Affluent 31.5% Barchart image
Black Poor 30.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.1% Barchart image
Affluent 31.3% Barchart image
Asian Poor 29.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.9% Barchart image
Affluent 32.3% Barchart image
28: Denver-Aurora, CO Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 27.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.8% Barchart image
Affluent 36.5% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 33.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.7% Barchart image
Affluent 36.5% Barchart image
Black Poor 30.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.1% Barchart image
Affluent 37.5% Barchart image
Asian Poor 28.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.3% Barchart image
Affluent 37.0% Barchart image
29: Des Moines, IA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 32.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.3% Barchart image
Affluent 35.1% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 33.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.4% Barchart image
Affluent 33.3% Barchart image
Black Poor 32.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.9% Barchart image
Affluent 32.4% Barchart image
Asian Poor 31.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.6% Barchart image
Affluent 35.7% Barchart image
30: Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 31.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.2% Barchart image
Affluent 34.6% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 35.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.6% Barchart image
Affluent 34.8% Barchart image
Black Poor 33.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.7% Barchart image
Affluent 33.7% Barchart image
Asian Poor 30.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.0% Barchart image
Affluent 35.0% Barchart image
31: El Paso, TX Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 42.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 43.8% Barchart image
Affluent 43.3% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 45.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 47.6% Barchart image
Affluent 46.3% Barchart image
Black Poor 46.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 50.5% Barchart image
Affluent 47.3% Barchart image
Asian Poor 40.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 41.5% Barchart image
Affluent 46.2% Barchart image
32: Fresno, CA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 38.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 39.0% Barchart image
Affluent 39.4% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 47.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 46.1% Barchart image
Affluent 44.6% Barchart image
Black Poor 43.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 43.4% Barchart image
Affluent 42.0% Barchart image
Asian Poor 45.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 42.9% Barchart image
Affluent 41.7% Barchart image
33: Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 35.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.2% Barchart image
Affluent 38.1% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 39.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 39.6% Barchart image
Affluent 40.8% Barchart image
Black Poor 35.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.5% Barchart image
Affluent 36.4% Barchart image
Asian Poor 33.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.6% Barchart image
Affluent 35.8% Barchart image
34: Greensboro-High Point, NC Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 30.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.6% Barchart image
Affluent 32.4% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 30.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.7% Barchart image
Affluent 31.8% Barchart image
Black Poor 31.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.2% Barchart image
Affluent 32.5% Barchart image
Asian Poor 28.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.8% Barchart image
Affluent 32.3% Barchart image
35: Greenville, SC Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 31.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.5% Barchart image
Affluent 34.1% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 30.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.6% Barchart image
Affluent 33.7% Barchart image
Black Poor 30.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.1% Barchart image
Affluent 34.0% Barchart image
Asian Poor 24.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 29.8% Barchart image
Affluent 35.1% Barchart image
36: Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 29.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.4% Barchart image
Affluent 31.4% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 34.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.9% Barchart image
Affluent 30.4% Barchart image
Black Poor 31.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.8% Barchart image
Affluent 32.4% Barchart image
Asian Poor 30.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 29.2% Barchart image
Affluent 30.0% Barchart image
37: Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 30.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.9% Barchart image
Affluent 32.7% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 34.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.0% Barchart image
Affluent 32.1% Barchart image
Black Poor 33.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.3% Barchart image
Affluent 31.0% Barchart image
Asian Poor 28.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 29.5% Barchart image
Affluent 31.3% Barchart image
38: Honolulu, HI Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 33.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 37.3% Barchart image
Affluent 33.3% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 37.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 39.9% Barchart image
Affluent 35.6% Barchart image
Black Poor 48.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 52.4% Barchart image
Affluent 44.9% Barchart image
Asian Poor 27.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.0% Barchart image
Affluent 31.3% Barchart image
39: Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 36.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 37.6% Barchart image
Affluent 40.3% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 41.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 42.1% Barchart image
Affluent 42.9% Barchart image
Black Poor 36.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 38.6% Barchart image
Affluent 41.5% Barchart image
Asian Poor 37.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 39.8% Barchart image
Affluent 43.3% Barchart image
40: Indianapolis, IN Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 32.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.1% Barchart image
Affluent 37.3% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 31.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.5% Barchart image
Affluent 36.3% Barchart image
Black Poor 30.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.6% Barchart image
Affluent 32.6% Barchart image
Asian Poor 29.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.0% Barchart image
Affluent 38.4% Barchart image
41: Jackson, MS Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 35.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.9% Barchart image
Affluent 36.9% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor
Middle-Income
Affluent
Black Poor 35.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 37.2% Barchart image
Affluent 38.3% Barchart image
Asian Poor
Middle-Income
Affluent
42: Jacksonville, FL Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 33.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.6% Barchart image
Affluent 35.1% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 34.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.2% Barchart image
Affluent 37.1% Barchart image
Black Poor 32.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.6% Barchart image
Affluent 35.7% Barchart image
Asian Poor 34.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.4% Barchart image
Affluent 37.0% Barchart image
43: Kansas City, MO-KS Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 31.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.2% Barchart image
Affluent 36.8% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 32.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.4% Barchart image
Affluent 35.8% Barchart image
Black Poor 31.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.7% Barchart image
Affluent 33.6% Barchart image
Asian Poor 27.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.6% Barchart image
Affluent 36.3% Barchart image
44: Knoxville, TN Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 28.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.1% Barchart image
Affluent 31.5% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 24.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 29.1% Barchart image
Affluent 29.3% Barchart image
Black Poor 27.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 27.4% Barchart image
Affluent 28.8% Barchart image
Asian Poor 19.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 26.3% Barchart image
Affluent 33.6% Barchart image
45: Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 27.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 29.0% Barchart image
Affluent 30.1% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 31.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.4% Barchart image
Affluent 31.8% Barchart image
Black Poor 30.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.6% Barchart image
Affluent 31.8% Barchart image
Asian Poor
Middle-Income
Affluent
46: Lancaster, PA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 33.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.1% Barchart image
Affluent 34.5% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 37.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.4% Barchart image
Affluent 35.7% Barchart image
Black Poor 36.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.1% Barchart image
Affluent 34.5% Barchart image
Asian Poor 30.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.5% Barchart image
Affluent 33.2% Barchart image
47: Las Vegas-Paradise, NV Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 28.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.6% Barchart image
Affluent 32.8% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 35.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.7% Barchart image
Affluent 36.6% Barchart image
Black Poor 35.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.4% Barchart image
Affluent 37.7% Barchart image
Asian Poor 29.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.6% Barchart image
Affluent 33.9% Barchart image
48: Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 33.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.8% Barchart image
Affluent 33.5% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 34.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.6% Barchart image
Affluent 33.3% Barchart image
Black Poor 32.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.1% Barchart image
Affluent 33.7% Barchart image
Asian Poor 29.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 29.1% Barchart image
Affluent 33.2% Barchart image
49: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 31.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.2% Barchart image
Affluent 32.8% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 47.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 46.3% Barchart image
Affluent 44.0% Barchart image
Black Poor 42.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 39.7% Barchart image
Affluent 37.5% Barchart image
Asian Poor 36.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 37.0% Barchart image
Affluent 37.4% Barchart image
50: Louisville, KY-IN Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 31.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.8% Barchart image
Affluent 33.8% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 31.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.0% Barchart image
Affluent 33.7% Barchart image
Black Poor 32.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.5% Barchart image
Affluent 32.3% Barchart image
Asian Poor 29.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.0% Barchart image
Affluent 32.5% Barchart image
51: Madison, WI Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 25.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.6% Barchart image
Affluent 33.2% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 24.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 27.9% Barchart image
Affluent 32.5% Barchart image
Black Poor 25.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 28.9% Barchart image
Affluent 27.4% Barchart image
Asian Poor 19.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 26.8% Barchart image
Affluent 28.1% Barchart image
52: McAllen-Edinburg-Pharr, TX Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 44.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 44.0% Barchart image
Affluent 45.1% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 52.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 50.9% Barchart image
Affluent 49.4% Barchart image
Black Poor
Middle-Income
Affluent
Asian Poor
Middle-Income
Affluent
53: Memphis, TN-MS-AR Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 33.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.2% Barchart image
Affluent 37.3% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 34.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.1% Barchart image
Affluent 38.0% Barchart image
Black Poor 35.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 37.0% Barchart image
Affluent 38.1% Barchart image
Asian Poor 29.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.7% Barchart image
Affluent 35.4% Barchart image
54: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach, FL Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 22.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 26.2% Barchart image
Affluent 29.6% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 32.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.5% Barchart image
Affluent 37.3% Barchart image
Black Poor 37.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 37.8% Barchart image
Affluent 39.2% Barchart image
Asian Poor 33.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.8% Barchart image
Affluent 38.1% Barchart image
55: Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 28.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.7% Barchart image
Affluent 33.4% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 37.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.1% Barchart image
Affluent 34.0% Barchart image
Black Poor 38.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 37.6% Barchart image
Affluent 36.7% Barchart image
Asian Poor 27.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.9% Barchart image
Affluent 31.7% Barchart image
56: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 30.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.8% Barchart image
Affluent 37.8% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 30.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.9% Barchart image
Affluent 35.4% Barchart image
Black Poor 31.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.5% Barchart image
Affluent 34.7% Barchart image
Asian Poor 31.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.4% Barchart image
Affluent 36.1% Barchart image
57: Modesto, CA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 39.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 40.6% Barchart image
Affluent 40.2% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 46.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 46.4% Barchart image
Affluent 45.8% Barchart image
Black Poor 45.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 43.5% Barchart image
Affluent 44.4% Barchart image
Asian Poor 44.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 44.4% Barchart image
Affluent 44.0% Barchart image
58: Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro, TN Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 31.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.2% Barchart image
Affluent 35.3% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 29.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.5% Barchart image
Affluent 32.8% Barchart image
Black Poor 32.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.8% Barchart image
Affluent 33.3% Barchart image
Asian Poor 25.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 29.1% Barchart image
Affluent 33.7% Barchart image
59: New Haven-Milford, CT Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 29.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.8% Barchart image
Affluent 32.6% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 34.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.5% Barchart image
Affluent 33.5% Barchart image
Black Poor 34.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.6% Barchart image
Affluent 33.1% Barchart image
Asian Poor 24.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 28.8% Barchart image
Affluent 31.3% Barchart image
60: New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 30.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.5% Barchart image
Affluent 33.9% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 31.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.4% Barchart image
Affluent 33.6% Barchart image
Black Poor 35.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.9% Barchart image
Affluent 37.2% Barchart image
Asian Poor 36.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.1% Barchart image
Affluent 36.3% Barchart image
61: New York-Newark-Edison, NY-NJ-PA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 29.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.6% Barchart image
Affluent 32.3% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 37.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.3% Barchart image
Affluent 35.1% Barchart image
Black Poor 36.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.7% Barchart image
Affluent 35.5% Barchart image
Asian Poor 30.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.9% Barchart image
Affluent 32.2% Barchart image
62: Ogden-Clearfield, UT Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 42.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 46.0% Barchart image
Affluent 48.3% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 41.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 43.1% Barchart image
Affluent 44.9% Barchart image
Black Poor 42.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 44.1% Barchart image
Affluent 47.2% Barchart image
Asian Poor 43.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 46.0% Barchart image
Affluent 48.3% Barchart image
63: Oklahoma City, OK Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 31.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.6% Barchart image
Affluent 35.0% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 33.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.2% Barchart image
Affluent 34.9% Barchart image
Black Poor 30.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.3% Barchart image
Affluent 32.4% Barchart image
Asian Poor 27.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.3% Barchart image
Affluent 35.9% Barchart image
64: Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 31.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.0% Barchart image
Affluent 37.5% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 33.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.2% Barchart image
Affluent 36.2% Barchart image
Black Poor 35.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.2% Barchart image
Affluent 37.8% Barchart image
Asian Poor 26.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.2% Barchart image
Affluent 38.4% Barchart image
65: Orlando, FL Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 29.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.2% Barchart image
Affluent 34.0% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 34.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.2% Barchart image
Affluent 37.2% Barchart image
Black Poor 34.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.2% Barchart image
Affluent 37.3% Barchart image
Asian Poor 32.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.3% Barchart image
Affluent 37.7% Barchart image
66: Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 36.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 37.7% Barchart image
Affluent 39.7% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 46.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 45.8% Barchart image
Affluent 45.1% Barchart image
Black Poor 44.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 43.0% Barchart image
Affluent 43.0% Barchart image
Asian Poor 42.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 43.2% Barchart image
Affluent 43.4% Barchart image
67: Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 24.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 27.4% Barchart image
Affluent 27.5% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 29.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.9% Barchart image
Affluent 28.9% Barchart image
Black Poor 29.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.4% Barchart image
Affluent 31.8% Barchart image
Asian Poor 26.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 29.3% Barchart image
Affluent 26.7% Barchart image
68: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 30.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.1% Barchart image
Affluent 34.3% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 39.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.3% Barchart image
Affluent 35.4% Barchart image
Black Poor 31.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.1% Barchart image
Affluent 32.7% Barchart image
Asian Poor 27.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.0% Barchart image
Affluent 33.5% Barchart image
69: Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 28.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.1% Barchart image
Affluent 34.2% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 40.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 40.5% Barchart image
Affluent 40.5% Barchart image
Black Poor 38.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 38.1% Barchart image
Affluent 39.2% Barchart image
Asian Poor 30.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.3% Barchart image
Affluent 37.6% Barchart image
70: Pittsburgh, PA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 26.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 28.1% Barchart image
Affluent 30.0% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 24.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 26.6% Barchart image
Affluent 28.4% Barchart image
Black Poor 28.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 27.0% Barchart image
Affluent 27.5% Barchart image
Asian Poor 16.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 22.0% Barchart image
Affluent 28.9% Barchart image
71: Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 30.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.3% Barchart image
Affluent 34.7% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 32.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.1% Barchart image
Affluent 35.7% Barchart image
Black Poor 28.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.4% Barchart image
Affluent 32.1% Barchart image
Asian Poor 29.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.9% Barchart image
Affluent 35.3% Barchart image
72: Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 37.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 37.5% Barchart image
Affluent 38.7% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 36.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 38.2% Barchart image
Affluent 39.2% Barchart image
Black Poor 36.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.6% Barchart image
Affluent 37.5% Barchart image
Asian Poor 33.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.8% Barchart image
Affluent 37.4% Barchart image
73: Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 30.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.4% Barchart image
Affluent 32.7% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 38.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.9% Barchart image
Affluent 36.3% Barchart image
Black Poor 35.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.8% Barchart image
Affluent 34.5% Barchart image
Asian Poor 30.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.6% Barchart image
Affluent 33.5% Barchart image
74: Provo-Orem, UT Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 43.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 50.2% Barchart image
Affluent 54.1% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 44.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 47.0% Barchart image
Affluent 50.9% Barchart image
Black Poor
Middle-Income
Affluent
Asian Poor 39.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 42.7% Barchart image
Affluent 49.9% Barchart image
75: Raleigh-Cary, NC Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 32.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.1% Barchart image
Affluent 37.5% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 32.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.6% Barchart image
Affluent 36.3% Barchart image
Black Poor 32.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.0% Barchart image
Affluent 36.4% Barchart image
Asian Poor 29.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.5% Barchart image
Affluent 38.5% Barchart image
76: Richmond, VA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 30.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.0% Barchart image
Affluent 36.2% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 31.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.9% Barchart image
Affluent 35.5% Barchart image
Black Poor 31.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.2% Barchart image
Affluent 34.0% Barchart image
Asian Poor 27.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.7% Barchart image
Affluent 35.7% Barchart image
77: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 36.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 38.9% Barchart image
Affluent 40.6% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 47.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 48.1% Barchart image
Affluent 48.4% Barchart image
Black Poor 46.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 48.2% Barchart image
Affluent 49.3% Barchart image
Asian Poor 41.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 45.8% Barchart image
Affluent 47.8% Barchart image
78: Rochester, NY Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 31.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.5% Barchart image
Affluent 34.2% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 36.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.3% Barchart image
Affluent 35.0% Barchart image
Black Poor 36.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.2% Barchart image
Affluent 35.6% Barchart image
Asian Poor 26.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.2% Barchart image
Affluent 33.6% Barchart image
79: Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 31.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.7% Barchart image
Affluent 35.3% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 35.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 37.0% Barchart image
Affluent 38.4% Barchart image
Black Poor 37.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 39.0% Barchart image
Affluent 40.9% Barchart image
Asian Poor 34.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 37.9% Barchart image
Affluent 38.4% Barchart image
80: Salt Lake City, UT Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 35.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 42.0% Barchart image
Affluent 44.4% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 38.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 42.0% Barchart image
Affluent 46.2% Barchart image
Black Poor 32.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 40.7% Barchart image
Affluent 42.9% Barchart image
Asian Poor 35.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 41.3% Barchart image
Affluent 45.8% Barchart image
81: San Antonio, TX Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 34.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.5% Barchart image
Affluent 37.2% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 37.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 38.8% Barchart image
Affluent 39.2% Barchart image
Black Poor 36.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 39.0% Barchart image
Affluent 41.2% Barchart image
Asian Poor 34.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 37.9% Barchart image
Affluent 38.1% Barchart image
82: San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 30.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.8% Barchart image
Affluent 33.1% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 42.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 41.0% Barchart image
Affluent 39.8% Barchart image
Black Poor 40.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 41.0% Barchart image
Affluent 40.4% Barchart image
Asian Poor 36.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 38.8% Barchart image
Affluent 40.9% Barchart image
83: San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 26.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 28.0% Barchart image
Affluent 29.5% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 34.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.6% Barchart image
Affluent 35.2% Barchart image
Black Poor 32.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.7% Barchart image
Affluent 33.3% Barchart image
Asian Poor 23.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 29.0% Barchart image
Affluent 32.6% Barchart image
84: San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 32.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.4% Barchart image
Affluent 34.5% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 39.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 40.4% Barchart image
Affluent 41.0% Barchart image
Black Poor 35.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.8% Barchart image
Affluent 38.6% Barchart image
Asian Poor 35.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 37.7% Barchart image
Affluent 38.1% Barchart image
85: Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, FL Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 19.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 20.3% Barchart image
Affluent 20.2% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 27.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 25.6% Barchart image
Affluent 25.5% Barchart image
Black Poor 30.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 29.7% Barchart image
Affluent 29.7% Barchart image
Asian Poor
Middle-Income
Affluent
86: Scranton-Wilkes-Barre, PA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 26.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 27.8% Barchart image
Affluent 28.8% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 26.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 26.4% Barchart image
Affluent 28.5% Barchart image
Black Poor 23.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 26.4% Barchart image
Affluent 26.6% Barchart image
Asian Poor
Middle-Income
Affluent
87: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 30.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.3% Barchart image
Affluent 34.3% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 30.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.1% Barchart image
Affluent 34.5% Barchart image
Black Poor 29.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.2% Barchart image
Affluent 33.7% Barchart image
Asian Poor 28.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.7% Barchart image
Affluent 33.5% Barchart image
88: Springfield, MA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 30.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.6% Barchart image
Affluent 31.6% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 37.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.7% Barchart image
Affluent 34.3% Barchart image
Black Poor 35.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.6% Barchart image
Affluent 34.4% Barchart image
Asian Poor 30.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 28.7% Barchart image
Affluent 30.8% Barchart image
89: St. Louis, MO-IL Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 32.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.6% Barchart image
Affluent 35.5% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 30.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.1% Barchart image
Affluent 34.2% Barchart image
Black Poor 31.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.4% Barchart image
Affluent 33.1% Barchart image
Asian Poor 25.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 29.8% Barchart image
Affluent 33.3% Barchart image
90: Stockton, CA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 38.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 39.1% Barchart image
Affluent 41.3% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 42.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 43.2% Barchart image
Affluent 44.2% Barchart image
Black Poor 43.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 46.5% Barchart image
Affluent 49.6% Barchart image
Asian Poor 43.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 45.1% Barchart image
Affluent 46.2% Barchart image
91: Syracuse, NY Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 31.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.5% Barchart image
Affluent 34.9% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 30.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.1% Barchart image
Affluent 35.0% Barchart image
Black Poor 34.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.1% Barchart image
Affluent 35.5% Barchart image
Asian Poor 21.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 28.4% Barchart image
Affluent 32.7% Barchart image
92: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 23.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 25.5% Barchart image
Affluent 27.9% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 29.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.7% Barchart image
Affluent 31.7% Barchart image
Black Poor 31.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.4% Barchart image
Affluent 33.0% Barchart image
Asian Poor 27.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 28.5% Barchart image
Affluent 30.6% Barchart image
93: Toledo, OH Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 31.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.1% Barchart image
Affluent 32.9% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 34.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.0% Barchart image
Affluent 33.5% Barchart image
Black Poor 31.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.9% Barchart image
Affluent 29.9% Barchart image
Asian Poor 28.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 29.6% Barchart image
Affluent 33.1% Barchart image
94: Tucson, AZ Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 26.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 28.6% Barchart image
Affluent 29.2% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 35.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.2% Barchart image
Affluent 35.1% Barchart image
Black Poor 32.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.5% Barchart image
Affluent 33.8% Barchart image
Asian Poor 25.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 28.4% Barchart image
Affluent 30.9% Barchart image
95: Tulsa, OK Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 32.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.9% Barchart image
Affluent 35.7% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 31.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.2% Barchart image
Affluent 35.0% Barchart image
Black Poor 32.8% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.7% Barchart image
Affluent 34.8% Barchart image
Asian Poor 30.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.1% Barchart image
Affluent 37.3% Barchart image
96: Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 34.3% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.4% Barchart image
Affluent 36.8% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 37.5% Barchart image
Middle-Income 39.4% Barchart image
Affluent 39.8% Barchart image
Black Poor 35.7% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.9% Barchart image
Affluent 38.2% Barchart image
Asian Poor 36.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 39.8% Barchart image
Affluent 42.1% Barchart image
97: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 31.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.1% Barchart image
Affluent 35.5% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 31.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.1% Barchart image
Affluent 34.6% Barchart image
Black Poor 31.6% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.1% Barchart image
Affluent 35.1% Barchart image
Asian Poor 28.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.4% Barchart image
Affluent 36.4% Barchart image
98: Wichita, KS Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 33.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.3% Barchart image
Affluent 38.0% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 35.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 35.1% Barchart image
Affluent 36.7% Barchart image
Black Poor 32.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.9% Barchart image
Affluent 33.6% Barchart image
Asian Poor 31.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 36.8% Barchart image
Affluent 35.8% Barchart image
99: Worcester, MA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 33.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 34.0% Barchart image
Affluent 36.1% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 34.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 33.3% Barchart image
Affluent 33.0% Barchart image
Black Poor 32.4% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.3% Barchart image
Affluent 33.0% Barchart image
Asian Poor 32.2% Barchart image
Middle-Income 32.7% Barchart image
Affluent 36.0% Barchart image
100: Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA Value Scale
Non-Hispanic White Poor 29.1% Barchart image
Middle-Income 29.7% Barchart image
Affluent 30.1% Barchart image
Hispanic Poor 30.0% Barchart image
Middle-Income 30.1% Barchart image
Affluent 31.0% Barchart image
Black Poor 30.9% Barchart image
Middle-Income 31.1% Barchart image
Affluent 30.3% Barchart image
Asian Poor
Middle-Income
Affluent

Definition: This indicator provides the share households headed by families with children for the average neighborhood in which each racial group lives, for people of different income groups. For instance, if the value is 10% for affluent blacks, this statistic is interpreted as "The average affluent black household in this metro area lives in a neighborhood where 10% of households are headed by families with children."

Notes: Children are defined as never married "own children" under age 18 living at home. "Own children" are biological children, step children, or adopted children of the household head. Income categories are defined as "poor" (income below $30,000 in 1999), "affluent" (income more than $60,000 in 1999), and "middle income" (those falling in between). Excludes metro areas with less than 5,000 population of the specified racial/ethnic group.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census, Summary File 3 accessed through the Neighborhood Change Database.