Unemployment Rate by Gender - Rankings - diversitydata.org - data for diverse and equitable metropolitan areas

Unemployment Rate by Gender

Year: 2000; Gender: All; Ordered: alphabetically; Region: 100 Largest MSAs

Why don’t my MSA choices always appear consistently across all reports?

Go to Indicator definition

Scale Range: 3.0% – 13.0%

1: Akron, OH	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

2: Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	5.0%

3: Albuquerque, NM	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	6.0%

4: Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	5.0%

5: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

6: Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	7.0%

7: Austin-Round Rock, TX	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	4.0%

8: Bakersfield, CA	Value
Male	11.0%
Female	13.0%

9: Baltimore-Towson, MD	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

10: Baton Rouge, LA	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	6.0%

11: Birmingham-Hoover, AL	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	6.0%

12: Boise City-Nampa, ID	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	4.0%

13: Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	4.0%

14: Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

15: Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Tonawanda, NY	Value
Male	8.0%
Female	6.0%

16: Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL	Value
Male	3.0%
Female	4.0%

17: Charleston-North Charleston, SC	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	6.0%

18: Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	6.0%

19: Chattanooga, TN-GA	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	6.0%

20: Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	6.0%

21: Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	4.0%

22: Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	5.0%

23: Colorado Springs, CO	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	5.0%

24: Columbia, SC	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	6.0%

25: Columbus, OH	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	4.0%

26: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	5.0%

27: Dayton, OH	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

28: Denver-Aurora, CO	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	4.0%

29: Des Moines, IA	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	4.0%

30: Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	6.0%

31: El Paso, TX	Value
Male	9.0%
Female	10.0%

32: Fresno, CA	Value
Male	12.0%
Female	12.0%

33: Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	5.0%

34: Greensboro-High Point, NC	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

35: Greenville, SC	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	6.0%

36: Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	4.0%

37: Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	5.0%

38: Honolulu, HI	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	5.0%

39: Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	7.0%

40: Indianapolis, IN	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	5.0%

41: Jackson, MS	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	7.0%

42: Jacksonville, FL	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	5.0%

43: Kansas City, MO-KS	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	4.0%

44: Knoxville, TN	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

45: Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	6.0%

46: Lancaster, PA	Value
Male	3.0%
Female	3.0%

47: Las Vegas-Paradise, NV	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	7.0%

48: Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

49: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA	Value
Male	7.0%
Female	8.0%

50: Louisville, KY-IN	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

51: Madison, WI	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	3.0%

52: McAllen-Edinburg-Pharr, TX	Value
Male	12.0%
Female	12.0%

53: Memphis, TN-MS-AR	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	7.0%

54: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach, FL	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	8.0%

55: Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

56: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	3.0%

57: Modesto, CA	Value
Male	10.0%
Female	13.0%

58: Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro, TN	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	5.0%

59: New Haven-Milford, CT	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	6.0%

60: New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	7.0%

61: New York-Newark-Edison, NY-NJ-PA	Value
Male	7.0%
Female	7.0%

62: Ogden-Clearfield, UT	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

63: Oklahoma City, OK	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	5.0%

64: Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	4.0%

65: Orlando, FL	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	5.0%

66: Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

67: Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

68: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	6.0%

69: Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

70: Pittsburgh, PA	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	6.0%

71: Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	5.0%

72: Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

73: Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	5.0%

74: Provo-Orem, UT	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	5.0%

75: Raleigh-Cary, NC	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	4.0%

76: Richmond, VA	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	4.0%

77: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA	Value
Male	7.0%
Female	9.0%

78: Rochester, NY	Value
Male	7.0%
Female	5.0%

79: Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA	Value
Male	7.0%
Female	6.0%

80: Salt Lake City, UT	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	5.0%

81: San Antonio, TX	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	6.0%

82: San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	6.0%

83: San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

84: San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	4.0%

85: Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, FL	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	4.0%

86: Scranton-Wilkes-Barre, PA	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	5.0%

87: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

88: Springfield, MA	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	5.0%

89: St. Louis, MO-IL	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	6.0%

90: Stockton, CA	Value
Male	10.0%
Female	11.0%

91: Syracuse, NY	Value
Male	7.0%
Female	5.0%

92: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

93: Toledo, OH	Value
Male	6.0%
Female	6.0%

94: Tucson, AZ	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

95: Tulsa, OK	Value
Male	5.0%
Female	5.0%

96: Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	6.0%

97: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	4.0%

98: Wichita, KS	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	5.0%

99: Worcester, MA	Value
Male	4.0%
Female	4.0%

100: Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA	Value
Male	7.0%
Female	5.0%

Definition: Share of population age 16+ in the labor force who are unemployed

Source: 2000 Census Summary File 3